A General Apology and a Question

Dear Greg, Heather, Kate, Mckenzie, and Shallyn (and anyone else who may be reading this),

I’m sorry if anything I’ve written offends you or just downright bores you. Please let me know what you’d like to read about — and what I can leave off discussing.

This blog is for you (I can easily journal for my own interest offline), so I’d like to write about things that you actually want to read about.

I feel like my posts are all hit-or-miss, I mean, I’m either babbling about something obscure, or going on about dodgy politics, or I don’t even know what else.

What do you come here and hope to read about? What are you happy to see? What are you disappointed to see? Any kind of feedback would be very much appreciated.

If left to my own devices, I’d end up talking incessantly about movies, actors/other men, music, current issues, possibly food, costumes, school, or writing, and I know that those aren’t all to everyone’s taste. The thing is, I don’t know if they’re to any of your tastes.

So, please, let me know what I could be doing better.

Thanks, cats!
xo

Opposites

“A very different Holmes, this active, alert man, from the introspective and pallid dreamer of Baker Street” (ACD, “The Priory School”).

Talk Talk Talk

I also think that we have a right (though perhaps not a moral obligation) to speak up if people are doing things to hurt themselves. Of course, they don’t have to listen to our suggestions/concern.

But, for example, unless someone is living in total isolation, alcoholism has an impact on more than just the person who’s drinking. I guess we don’t have a right to intervene, but surely we’re allowed to say something? Not that it does any good.

*sigh*

Right. I’m done. All this serious stuff annoys the heck out of me.

*retreats into self/imaginary world*

PS:

If I ever say anything that makes you think, “No way, Erin — you’re completely wrong, and I can’t believe you think that!” please don’t hesitate to point it out to me, and maybe (ideally) offer a reason why you disagree.

I’m always happy to reconsider and revise my opinions. No point in being wrong just for the sake of being resolute.

=]

xo

Mmm, Pomegranates!

I could never eat locally. Unless I moved somewhere where they could grow all types of crops.

BUT.

I’m not all about freedom and liberty. That’s probably tantamount to saying “I eat sauteed babies and kittens for lunch,” but I’ll persevere and try to explain myself.

I’ll blame my country for my outlook: The United States espouses “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” which are set out as inalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence. The Canadian equivalent is “Peace, order, and good government.” Sliiiight difference of values.

In my opinion (important to clarify?), for every right, we have a responsibility. I don’t think a good society is based on people doing whatever they want and (here’s the real spanner in the works) thinking or saying whatever they want.

There’s a quote misattributed to Voltaire that goes, “I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

I don’t agree with that. I would not defend anyone’s right, for example, to say things that could be (or are intentionally) harmful to others — whether individuals or whole groups of people. Pretty much the authorities agree with me: you can sue people for slander and libel, and there are (in Canada, at least) restrictions on “hate speech.”

This isn’t about glorifying Canada. As much as I like a lot of things about the country, I’m not patriotic, and I think Canada and Canadians have done and continue to do things I’m not proud of and don’t support.

This is about reading an article on the KKK wanting to “demonstrate peaceably.” I’m sorry, but, no. If the whole point of your group is to be racist and denounce blacks, Jews, and other minorities, I don’t support your right to be vocal about your beliefs. In fact, I don’t even think you should think what you do. I would NOT demonstrate violently to try to stop you or force you to change your beliefs, but I would certainly speak out (if I didn’t fear for my life), and hope that eventually you or your descendants would be more tolerant towards your fellow human beings.

Now, you might ask, “But Erin, dudette, you’re hating on the KKK; isn’t that the same as what they’re doing to other minority groups?” And I would answer, “No, because their mandate is to segregate or eliminate whole groups of people based on ethnicity or religion, whereas those minorities aren’t by definition out to hurt people.” (No comments from the Nazi gallery.)

Of course, if whatever religion you follow tells you to kill anyone who’s not a believer (uhm, or anyone, period), that’s a different matter, and I’d oppose that religion. (This obviously doesn’t apply to religions that are misconstrued and used as another excuse for people to kill people.)

Unfortunately, there are squidgy lines between what’s acceptable and what’s not. I hope I’m able to keep an open mind about the whole thing. But that’s where I stand on the matter.

*holds her breath*

Just to clarify, I don’t think that Canadians in general or in specific are any nicer or more tolerant or more law-abiding or whatever than Americans. I think the concept of countries is pretty bunk, and that people are people no matter where you go, but that’s another issue (or two).

YES!

First off, I am so glad that Google didn’t leave out Count von Count in their celebration of the 40th anniversary of Sesame Street. I was worried, because stores never have Count merchandise — it’s always Oscar and Elmo and the Cookie Monster.

But check it out — it’s the Count, and he’s counting! ^_^

count von count

For the Record

Haven’t done this in a while.

James Bond

1. Sean Connery
2. Daniel Craig
3. Timothy Dalton
4. George Lazenby
5. Pierce Brosnan
6. Roger Moore

(Tim & Dan are sort of tied. Lazenby was helped by the fact that OHMSS is a great Bond flick. Brosnan and Moore don’t work for me in the role, although I like them in other things.)

While I’m at it:

The Doctor

1. Tom Baker
2. Peter Davison
3. Pat Troughton
4. Colin Baker
5. David Tennant
6. Christopher Eccleston
7. Jon Pertwee
8. William Hartnell

(Haven’t seen Sylvester McCoy, Paul McGann, or Matt Smith. Peter Cushing is pretty good as a non-canon Doctor.)

And, ok, ok . . .

Sherlock Holmes

1. Basil Rathbone
2. Jeremy Brett
3. Ronald Howard
4. Matt Frewer
5. Christopher Lee
6. Peter Cook
. . .
7. Jonathan Pryce

(By no means an extensive list of people who have played Holmes. And have yet to judge RDJ’s performance.)

Are there any other renowned British characters who’ve been played by several people that I need to rank? =P

OH!

Robin Hood

1. Disney’s fox (♥)
2. Cary Elwes
3. Errol Flynn
4. Rik Mayall
5. John Cleese
.
.
.
5 000 000. Kevin Costner

HA HA HA.

Hamlet

1. Kenneth Branagh
2. That guy from Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead
3. Laurence Olivier
4. Mel Gibson

Heathcliff

1. Timothy Dalton
2. Ralph Fiennes
3. Laurence Olivier
. . .
4. Tom Hardy
5. Mike Vogel

Mr Rochester

No clear winner. I’ve enjoyed all of the Mr Rochesters I’ve seen: Toby Stephens, William Hurt, Timothy Dalton, and Orson Welles.

Mr Darcy

1. Colin Firth
. . .
2. Laurence Olivier
3. Matthew Macfayden

And!

Dracula (Ok, not British: Romanian, written by an Irishman. Still.)

Actually, all these are pretty close . . .

1. Gary Oldman (the most attractive ‘^_^)
2. Leslie Nielsen (the funniest!)
3. Klaus Kinski (the scariest, and probably the most ‘realistic’)
4. Bela Lugosi (the most aristocratic . . . the original count!)
5. Christopher Lee (very suave, too. He may win the ‘most times playing the role’ prize.)
6. George Hamilton (hahah, also very funny!)

(Max Schreck as Count Orlock doesn’t technically count, but . . . he’s excellent, too.)

And the character’s American, but . . .

Batman

(Actually, the first four aren’t really in order!)

1. Val Kilmer
2. Christian Bale
3. Michael Keaton
4. Adam West
. . .
5. George Clooney

Quotes from Charlie Chaplin

The saddest thing I can imagine is to get used to luxury.

Failure is unimportant. It takes courage to make a fool of yourself.

I do not have much patience with a thing of beauty that must be explained to be understood. If it does need additional interpretation by someone other than the creator, then I question whether it has fulfilled its purpose.

Life is a tragedy when seen in close-up, but a comedy in long shot.

It isn’t the ups and downs that make life difficult; it’s the jerks.

I hope we shall abolish war and settle all differences at the conference table . . . I hope we shall abolish all hydrogen and atom bombs before they abolish us first.

Through humor, we see in what seems rational, the irrational; in what seems important, the unimportant. It also heightens our sense of survival and preserves our sanity.

A day without a laugh is a wasted day.

The Thirty-Nine Steps

I liked the movie much better.

Next Page »


I also believe in laughter and I know the world is mad.

NaNoWriMo

15 500/50 000

Currently Reading

+ The Big Sleep
. . . Raymond Chandler

+ The Return of Sherlock Holmes
. . . Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

To Read before 2010

+ The Valley of Fear
. . . Conan Doyle

+ Casebook of Sherlock Holmes
. . . Conan Doyle

+ His Last Bow
. . . Conan Doyle

+ Medea
. . . Euripides

+ An Enemy of the People
. . . Henrik Ibsen

+ When We Dead Awaken
. . . Ibsen

+ Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde
. . . Robert Louis Stevenson